|
| General help |
|
|
| Report abuse |
|
|
| Request assistance |
|
|
| Noticeboards |
|
|
- Example
===={{la|Intentionally permanent red link}}====
'''semi-protect'''. High level of IP vandalism. ~~~~
Administrator instructions
Current requests for protection
Place requests for either semi-protection, full protection, move protection, or create protection at the TOP of this section. Check here if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, There has recently been a significant amount of vandalism from IP's as such i think a temporary block would be of value .??? TALKies 16:19, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Random IP and new user vandalism from disgruntled fans; primarily removing content, but also adding false content. .-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 Semi-protected for a period of 1 week. After 1 week the page will be automatically unprotected. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Random IP and new user vandalism from disgruntled fans; primarily removing content, but also adding false content. .-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week. After 1 week the page will be automatically unprotected. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Indefinite semi protection vandalism, High amount of IP vandalism..?edMarkViolinistDrop me a line 14:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Ruslik (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection heavy IP vandalism since Keane left manager's post at Sunderland AFC earlier today. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days. After 3 days the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik (talk) 14:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
-
-
Two week semi-protection I missed these two articles in my last request. Part of a long-running edit war that began on November 4, when User:Howard the Duck removed charts that violate WP:BADCHARTS from I Belong to Me. Since then, multiple anonymous IPs (190.43.33.197, 190.43.147.102, 190.232.156.19, 200.106.16.107, etc) have been edit-warring the charts back in. When I removed some bad charts from A Public Affair on November 30, the war simply expanded. Punkox (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) has joined in, as well: he looks like the named account associated with the anonymous edits to me.
This has been a widespread problem: it has already resulted in protection of
-
-
-
- —Kww(talk) 13:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary-semi protection, dispute over manager's position, which is now confirmed to be vacant, IPs readding caretaker managers that are unconfirmed. Sunderland06 (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 Declined I see only one case of vandalism, which is not enough for protection. Ruslik (talk) 13:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think Sunderland06 is referring to an edit war of sorts rather than vandalism. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
long term semi-protect. Sock-puppets whitewashing the page removing validly cited information that is critical or negative. Admins have run CheckUser, found a lot of sock-puppets and banned them (as you can see in the talk). Yet for some reason the page is not semi-protected, so new sock-puppets keep being created, and they come and revert the page from a consensus version to a whitewashed version. Please semi-protect it (if not indef full protect) for a couple of months at least, in the hope that those using sock-puppets will see sense. Also note, this page has been under indef full-protect in the past for months at end. The whitewshers ignore any appeals made on talk page to discuss, and when the page is unprotected, return to their games. Makrandjoshi (talk) 15:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Indefinite full protect. We had this before, and then an admin decided to remove it. Semi protection will not help, because all the vandal edits are registered users. Some have been long-term sockpuppets. This article will not improve until those who want to make drastic edits come to the talk page and explain themselves. Please look at the protection history. Full protection is the only way to achieve stability. Let the community request unprotection when appropriate discussion has taken place. ~Amatulic (talk) 15:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month. After 1 month the page will be automatically unprotected. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Current requests for unprotection
If you simply want to make spelling corrections or add information to a protected page that is not disputed, and you are not involved in any disputes there, consider simply adding {{Editprotected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. See the list of current {{Editprotected}} requests.
If you do want a page that exists unprotected, please try to ask the protecting admin first before making a request here.
Check here if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection , Was protected as sub judice - it is no longer. [1].Scott Mac (Doc) 16:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 Note: Already unprotected. Protection was lost when Rodhullandemu (talk · contribs) deleted and restored the page. - auburnpilot talk 16:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Why must this specific page be closed off to those who may be able to improve and/or expand it? If knowledge is not mentioned on this page and someone wants to help the write(s) of this article they cannot. Therefore I request that the information on this page be unprotected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccleskeygenius1 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- This page is already unprotected. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
- When making requests here, either:
- Provide a good reason for a substantial edit to a protected page. These are only done in exceptional circumstances, or when there is very clear consensus for an edit and continued protection. Please link to the talk page where consensus was reached.
- Demonstrate that there is a clear dispute over a protected page, and that a specific dispute tag would be appropriate to add. Please link to the talk page where the dispute exists.
Note: Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add {{Editprotected}}, {{Editsemiprotected}} or {{Request edit}} to the article's talk page if you would like an inconsequential change rather than requesting it here, though most of these should simply wait for unprotection.
See also:
-
Fulfilled/denied requests
long term semi-protect. Daily and often fairly severe IP vandalism since the article was started in July 2007. The only good edits from anons have been a handful of minute grammar and spelling fixes. Peter Isotalo 09:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 month. After 3 month the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik (talk) 09:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, IP/anonymous vandalism. Frequency escalating in recent days. Also building number of blank edit summaries.Smatprt (talk) 06:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month. After 1 month the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik (talk) 07:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, SPA and anon IP vandalism continues. Well over 50% threshold. (second request).Beeblebrox (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Declined The level of vandalism is pretty low. Ruslik (talk) 07:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protect - Very recently released (and popular) movie; high level of IP vandalism immediately after last protection ended. Andrea (talk) 22:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month. After 1 month the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik (talk) 07:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
A KAS school faculty has been discovered attempting to remove the truth here at KAS. Allow the student body to edit. If you do not believe that we are misrepresenting our edits, you may contact us using the talk page or a visit to KAS to see the torn walls that we have here. Wikipedia should not be censored and we do not want to vandalize. We are only here to talk about the truth. Please unprotect.Thank you. 211.21.238.26 (talk) 04:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- The IP, and various SPA socks, are inserting attack material without sources, then reverting removal with false edit summaries. When told to provide sources, they produced a home-made website called "KAS SUCKS" and believe this is reliable. They are insistent that their material is true but it's not our job to decide that, it's our job to require reliable sources, and those they won't produce. ? ??EDVERS? a sweet and tender hooligan 07:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Long term semi-protection -- ALL edits by new/unregistered accounts are vandalism, libel, personal attacks, or unsourced gossip. Wow. Just wow. JBsupreme (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 User(s) blocked - as such protection is not needed. Tiptoety talk 06:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Numerous unconstructive edits have been made to the article as of late. -- Luke4545 (talk) 05:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of five days. Tiptoety talk 06:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism. Recurrent vandalism (check history). PBP (talk) 05:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. If there's significantly more disruptive activity in the future, consider relisting. Tiptoety talk 06:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protection vandalism. Recurrent vandalism (check history). Khullah (talk) 04:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. If there's significantly more disruptive activity in the future, consider relisting. Tiptoety talk 06:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Unprotection Page was protected by an administrator who was under the impression that there was an edit war between myself and another editor that first needed to be resolved. The other editor in question turned out to be a sockpuppeteer; his accounts are now blocked. Administrator recommended I request article unprotection here. Middayexpress (talk) 02:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 Unprotected Tiptoety talk 06:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Heavy IP and non-autoconfirmed vandalism. Frequency escalating in recent days.--Work permit (talk) 02:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks. After 2 weeks the page will be automatically unprotected. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 04:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Wouldn't a lot of blankers be attracted to this page? .Jonathan321 (talk) 03:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected pre-emptively. One might think so (refering to requestor's hypothesis), but apparently they aren't. DMacks (talk) 04:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Continuous vandalism after last protect..Icy // ? 01:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for 2 weeks. Thingg?? 02:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism, This page has seen quite a few vandalism attack recently. .The New Mikemoral (talk) 02:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months. Tiptoety talk 02:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protect - This is a BLP, and his son was recently arrested on suspicion of murder. Anons are trying to insert salacious information about the son on the father's article. 23:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week. After 1 week the page will be automatically unprotected. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 00:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
|
