|
The cosmic neutrino background (C?B) is the universe's background particle radiation composed of neutrinos.
Like the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the C?B is a relic of the big bang, and while the CMB dates from when the universe was 380,000 years old, the C?B decoupled from matter when the universe was 2 seconds old. It is estimated that the C?B has a temperature of roughly 1.95 K. Since low-energy neutrinos interact only very weakly with matter, they are notoriously difficult to detect and the C?B might never be observed directly. There is, however, compelling indirect evidence for its existence.
Derivation of the temperature of the C?B
Given the temperature of the CMB, the temperature of the C?B can be estimated. Before neutrinos decoupled from the rest of matter, the universe primarily consisted of neutrinos, electrons, positrons and photons, all in thermal equilibrium with each other. Once the temperature dropped below the masses of the W and Z bosons, the neutrinos decoupled from the rest of matter. Despite this decoupling, neutrinos and photons remained at the same temperature as the universe expanded. However, when the temperature dropped below the mass of the electron, most electrons and positrons annihilated, transferring their heat and entropy to photons, and thus increasing the temperature of the photons. So the ratio of the temperature of the photons before and after the electron-positron annihilation is the same as the ratio of the temperature of the photons and the neutrinos today. To find this ratio, we assume that the entropy of the universe was approximately conserved by the electron-positron annihilation. Then using
 ,
where s is the entropy, g is the effective number of degrees of freedom and T is the temperature, we find that
 ,
where the subscript 0 denotes before the electron-positron annihilation and 1 denotes after. To find g0, we add the degrees of freedom for electrons, positrons and photons:
- 2 for photons, since they are massless bosons
- 2(7/8) each for electrons and positrons, since they are fermions
g1 is just 2 for photons. So
 .
Given the current value of T? = 2.725K,[1] it follows that  .
The above discussion is valid for massless neutrinos, which are always relativistic. For neutrinos with a non-zero rest mass, the description in terms of a temperature is no longer appropriate after they become non-relativistic, i.e., when their thermal energy 3 / 2kT? falls below the rest mass energy m?c2. Instead, in this case one should rather track their energy density, which remains well-defined.
Indirect evidence for the C?B
Relativistic neutrinos contribute to the radiation energy density of the Universe ?R, typically parameterized in terms of the effective number of neutrino species N?:
![\rho_{\rm R} = \frac{\pi^2}{15} \, T_\gamma^4 (1+z)^4 \left[ 1 + \frac{7}{8} N_{\rm \nu} \left( \frac{4}{11} \right)^{4/3} \right],](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/0/d/40dea605107ded1762fa97f84bfd7090.png)
where z denotes the redshift. The first term in the square brackets is due to the CMB, the second comes from the C?B. The Standard Model with its three neutrino species predicts a value of  ,[2] including a small correction caused by a non-thermal distortion of the spectra during e+-e--annihilation. The radiation density had a major impact on various physical processes in the early Universe, leaving potentially detectable imprints on measurable quantities, thus allowing us to infer the value of N? from observations.
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
Due to its effect on the expansion rate of the Universe during Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), the theoretical expectations for the primordial abundances of light elements depend on N?. Astrophysical measurements of the primordial 4He and Deuterium abundances lead to a value of  at 68% c.l.,[3] in very good agreement with the Standard Model expectation.
CMB anisotropies and structure formation
The presence of the C?B affects the evolution of CMB anisotropies as well as the growth of matter perturbations in two ways: due to its contribution to the radiation density of the Universe (which determines for instance the time of matter-radiation equality), and due to the neutrinos' anisotropic stress which dampens the acoustic oscillations of the spectra. Additionally, free-streaming massive neutrinos suppress the growth of structure on small scales. The WMAP satellite's five-year data combined with type Ia Supernova data and information about the baryon acoustic oscillation scale yield  at 68% c.l.,[4] providing an independent confirmation of the BBN constraints. In the near future, probes such as the Planck satellite will likely improve present errors on N? by an order of magnitude.[5]
References
- ^ Fixsen, Dale; Mather, John (2002). "The Spectral Results of the Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer Instrument on COBE". Astrophysical Journal 581: 817-822, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...581..817F.
- ^ Mangano, Gianpiero; et al. (2005). "Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations". Nucl.Phys.B 729: 221-234, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0506164.
- ^ Cyburt, Richard; et al. (2005). "New BBN limits on physics beyond the standard model from He-4". Astropart.Phys. 23: 313-323, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0408033.
- ^ Komatsu, Eiichiro; et al. (2008). Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation, http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0547.
- ^ Bashinsky, Sergej; Seljak, Uroš (2004). "Neutrino perturbations in CMB anisotropy and matter clustering". Phys.Rev.D 69: 083002, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310198.
See also
| |
